Lessons from Palantir Alums About Building a Tech Company
anon 0x39d said in #2232 5mo ago:
I found this super interesting. The cadence of forward deployed engineers solving problems by any means necessary to get the sale then coming back and re-integrating that code and wisdom into the main product/codebase sounds like a great core engine for the company. No wonder Palantir is killing it.
I found this super i
anon 0x3a1 said in #2236 5mo ago:
I worked closely with Palantir guys for about a decade when I lived in Northern Virginia and worked in the DC tech scene. I saw their business model up close.
A key fact is that the customers were almost entirely government bureaucracies whose own technical capabilities were low. I can see this model being extended to enterprise customers with low technical capabilities.
There may be plenty such customers.
I don't think it makes much sense in contexts where part of a customer's goal is to develop internal technical capabilities.
A key fact is that the customers were almost entirely government bureaucracies whose own technical capabilities were low. I can see this model being extended to enterprise customers with low technical capabilities.
There may be plenty such customers.
I don't think it makes much sense in contexts where part of a customer's goal is to develop internal technical capabilities.
referenced by: >>2237
I worked closely wit
anon 0x39d said in #2237 5mo ago:
>>2236
That makes sense. The forward deployed engineers are the engineers the customer should have but don't.
That makes sense. The forward deployed engineers are the engineers the customer should have but don't.
That makes sense. Th