anon_kidw said in #3122 2w ago:
>>3106
3106 considers the weighting of civilizations, or one might use writing systems to segment (https://kamilkazani.substack.com/p/what-is-civilisation). But what if we just consider the similarities and characteristic traits between peoples?
There is a triangle of compromise where you can only have two of the three. Speed, quality, or cost.
I feel European/Christian society and its offshoots are both technological and emotional. East Asians are technological and tyrannical. Bantus are emotional and tyrannical.
These three societies form the corners of the triangle in accordance with the shape of the Old World, and I theoretically suspect differ from each other the most, though globalization itself has flattened habits but not necessarily the character of the peoples.
My remaining question lies within intermediate groups: where do Hispanics, Arabs, Slavs, or Indians fit in? (this analysis forsakes political units in favour of the peoples)
3106 considers the weighting of civilizations, or one might use writing systems to segment (https://kamilkazani.substack.com/p/what-is-civilisation). But what if we just consider the similarities and characteristic traits between peoples?
There is a triangle of compromise where you can only have two of the three. Speed, quality, or cost.
I feel European/Christian society and its offshoots are both technological and emotional. East Asians are technological and tyrannical. Bantus are emotional and tyrannical.
These three societies form the corners of the triangle in accordance with the shape of the Old World, and I theoretically suspect differ from each other the most, though globalization itself has flattened habits but not necessarily the character of the peoples.
My remaining question lies within intermediate groups: where do Hispanics, Arabs, Slavs, or Indians fit in? (this analysis forsakes political units in favour of the peoples)
3106 considers the w