sofiechan home

Radiopaper

anon_tubu said in #3070 3w ago:

https://radiopaper.com/about

Radiopaper is an interesting data point in the design space of social media. They've put some thought into it and landed someplace very different from Sofiechan. Their goal is to "improve conversation quality," which sounds goods, but they do it buy leaning into censorship mechanisms.

Note I said "interesting," not "good."

referenced by: >>3081 >>3103

Radiopaper is an int

anon_kije said in #3071 3w ago:

There’s a very entertaining similarity between the people who demand Linkedin norms for public discourse and LLM slop-puppet accounts. Ecco Homo!

There’s a very enter

anon_muju said in #3081 2w ago:

>>3070
interesting indeed. They seem to be building on the substack idea of bringing money into it. I think this results in slop incentives. My usual argument against that is this: High quality thought and speech is a luxury activity for the idle rich and ascetic brahmins, not something that can or should be commercialized. The New York Times and other actually profitable speech engines are more leveraging editorial quality into political power which they cash in for subscription dollars than they are creating a market for speech. I think that model makes more sense actually. If a speech platform is effective, it is primarily effective politically and culturally first, and commercially effective only derivative of that.

But who knows. Let a thousand flowers bloom. We need better social media so let's see where it goes.

interesting indeed.

You must login to post.