sofiechan home

The Libertarian Revolution in New Hampshire

anon_ruce said in #5565 1w ago: received

I knew the woke era was over when I arrived in New Hampshire in mid 2024. The libertarian Free State Project had taken over half the republican party and was well organized, debating how to clean up crime and homelessness, develop economic infrastructure, and deport liberals to Massachusetts. They were building serious social and party machinery, and even further developing their ideology with input from neoreactionary, fascist, and race realist ideas. Libertarianism had come a long way from the bizarre antisocial internet posture we might otherwise be familiar with, and was maturing into a serious revolutionary ideology. Clearly, someone was asleep over at the NYT.

If you don't know, the Free State Project was a pledge signed by 20k libertarians to move to NH and take over to create a free society if over 10k signed. It seems to have worked.

They had guys reading all the legislation and watching all the politicians like a hawk, producing freedom scores, empirically characterizing exactly which politicians were on-side, and thereby shaping the factional dynamics. They had social clubs and ambitions to build a serious "1930s-style" party apparatus. They even sent a bunch of us intellectuals to the countryside for a day of hard labor.

Most of all though, they had characters. I met a guy who was legally a woman (just to mess with the bureaucrats), transacted only in Monero, and split his time between freelance construction contracting and free state think tank work. I met a conspiracy theorist homesteader who didn't want "government food" and lived in a geodesic dome. I met aggressively libertarian moms who were really into guns and their sovereign right to use slurs. The kids were wild, longhaired, barefoot, and always climbing or play-fighting. When parents scolded them, it was about "property rights" and the "non-aggression principle".

Jeremy Kauffman, the apparent leader of the more radical faction, was in a class of his own. He plays up the aggressively offensive antics online to attract the right kind of people and repel the wrong kind of people. This includes getting into a filmed confrontation with the FBI about his right to call for assassinations of politicians *in general* (too specific and it becomes a legally actionable threat). He and congressman Travis Cocoran occasionally make waves by saying that it's morally permissible to assassinate anyone who proposes new taxes, on the grounds that it's a violation of the NAP.

Apparently the filtering strategy is working. He told me how at first, the libertarian scene was all those bleeding heart left-libertarians and the antisocials we know from the internet. But once things were in person, the well adjusted right libertarians proved dominant in actually setting up institutions and doing the work. The lefties flamed out and the antisocials marginalized themselves. The remainder all had volunteer t-shirts from the "porcfest" conference with little lego bricks on them with a sign "works well with others, but don't tread on me".

On race, they aren't pulling punches. Not all white people have the libertarian personality, but pretty much everyone who does is white, so Jeremy was pretty open about curating for that kind of racial personality, and deporting anyone who doesn't fit to Massachusetts.

In our circles, we wring our hands a bit sometimes about needing a real ideology that people actually believe in enough to fight politically and get organized. Believe it or not, the NH libertarians have it. They are fierce and highly ideological, constantly debating and making decisions on the finer points of libertarianism. It was crazy to see, but very heartening and enlightening. I'm glad it exists. If you want a window into another world, go see the free state project in NH. If you're "based" and just want a friendly place to live, go to NH.

Otherwise, NH was a paradise. It's New England, but not woke. We visited some more normal folks like Simon Sarris too, which was quite nice. 10/10 would recommend.

referenced by: >>5566

I knew the woke era received

anon_hijy said in #5566 7d ago: received

>>5565
Love this entire post ...

... except for the opening line about "the woke era being over." There's already lots of evidence (e.g., recent DSA electoral victories) that this isn't so. Most of all, let's see how the midterms go. We could soon find that a great deal of woke is very much back. It may not be the more colorful cultural stuff like trans. It may be more hardcore economic leftism. But it will be just as hostile to everything we want to build.

referenced by: >>5569

Love this entire pos received

anon_ruce said in #5569 5d ago: received

>>5566
Yeah it will probably come back in a new and more terrible form, but there was a definite change in the air that was detectable by 2024 with a sudden reprieve from persecution, and opportunity to build again. Let's continue to use it well.

referenced by: >>5576

Yeah it will probabl received

anon_twcu said in #5576 21h ago: received

>>5569
There was a preference cascade but there remains a whole lot of build up stress, we may have undergone the phase transition from solid to liquid, but there's plenty of that potential left to pop over into Gas. I have been keeping my eye on the Free state Project, Mises caucus and other related movements for the better part of a decade, They really have been doing alot of the work, keeping away the barbarians and straussians with their infernal image. Though they still lack the ability to animate anything beyond the libertarian vanguard, so much work remains to be done in that respect, but they have a model that works, though outsiders wont stop talking about things like Grafton, which is like talking about the USSR under Lenin vs Stalin. New Hampshire is lovely, but we really need to use the apparatuses there to strike further as the appetite for change in the republican party is high and basically noone has any capacity to resolve it whom is also actually in the running, the left is likely to gain ground, and if we position ourselves well over the next 5 years, it could be the necessary steps to be kingmakers. But we definitely will need a FIRM presence in defense, information, and technology, which currently, the groypers have been giving the GOP staffing problems "are groypers too based to work for the GOP" but big tech remains mostly center-left(obviously no billionaire taxes lol) information has some headway with twitter, and the loosening of rules thanks to the intervening legally on the responsibilities of platforms, but defense and technology remain more difficult to penetrate. I expect these to more or less percolate from the sort of things the groypers are doing(defense) and the sort of things the palladium institute/related projects is(Technology). The result remains indeterminate at this time, though I have my hunches. NH decidely has next to no voice in big tech, but there are some decent candidates, or even startups that may be worth allying. The SF folks have their internal networks, and we need the same but these sort of message boards remain too opaque....

There was a preferen received

You must login to post.