in thread "Race in America": Well there's a few separate things going on here. One is that you're talking to people about a matter of sacred political taboo. You're simply not going to get rational thought about sacred taboos, that's the whole point: to freeze thought in some area wit... 2w ago (collapse hidden) log in to judge received 7.0 7.0 Well there's a few s (view hidden) log in to judge received 7.0 7.0 Yeah if we're doing politics, we're going to need a good and honest party line. What's the party line on race relations? I dunno let's figure it out here.... 2w ago (collapse hidden) log in to judge received 14.9 14.9 Yeah if we're doing (view hidden) log in to judge received 14.9 14.9 "Woke more correct" etc and the only people actually outdoing them are the unapologetic supremacists. Radical as it is, the Armarnite party line is more compelling in that way than the political compromise I outlined above in >>3835. The race blind meritoc... 2w ago (collapse hidden) log in to judge received 5.5 5.5 "Woke more correct" (view hidden) log in to judge received 5.5 5.5 I’m sorry for your loss. Most of the women i know, often from liberal backgrounds, are quite ok with their men’s unorthodox politics.... 2w ago (collapse hidden) log in to judge received 5.9 5.9 I’m sorry for your l (view hidden) log in to judge received 5.9 5.9 Truth and reconciliation is always a sham. Who gets to run the trial? But yeah it would be fun to do it for real. How do you keep mossad from wrecking the whole thing? Litigants are all anonymous, maybe, and run on secured infrastructure. Maybe we should r... 2w ago (collapse hidden) log in to judge received 3.9 3.9 Truth and reconcilia (view hidden) log in to judge received 3.9 3.9